About the Rules of University Conduct
The Rules of University Conduct are intended to ensure the protection of free speech and rights to engage in demonstrations and protests at Columbia. The Rules of University Conduct are administered by the Rules Administrator. The Rules Administrator works closely with the University Senate and, in particular, the Senate Committee on the Rules of University Conduct to ensure appropriate administration of the Rules.
History of the Rules of University Conduct
The Rules of University Conduct date back to 1968, following a referendum from the Columbia University Senate and the creation of the Rules of University Conduct Committee. In May 2015, the Rules were revised to strengthen the right of freedom of expression for every member of the University and the ability to openly demonstrate, rally, picket, and circulate petitions, while still protecting the rights of others and allowing the University to continue to function normally. In August 2024, the University Senate endorsed new guidelines to promote a common understanding of the Rules for the entire Columbia community.
Role of the Rules Administration
The Rules Administrator and the Office of Rules Administration investigate complaints filed under the Rules of University Conduct. Learn more about the Rules Administration Office below.
Role of the University Judicial Board
This University-wide panel hears allegations of violations under the Rules of University Conduct and provides sanctions. Learn more.
Role of the Senate Committee on the Rules of University Conduct
The Senate Committee reviews and recommends revisions to the Rules of University Conduct, as well as the means of enforcing those rules. Learn more.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Please use this form to report violations stemming from demonstrations and protests under the Rules of University Conduct.
The Office of Rules Administration will review the complaint. The Rules Administrator may decide that the complaint is without merit and dismiss it without pursuing it further. If it is determined that a potential violation of the Rules may have occurred, you will receive a letter by email from the Rules Administrator informing you of the complaint. Complaints may also be referred to other offices such as the Office of Institutional Equity or the Center for Student Success and Intervention (CSSI).
Depending on the severity of the complaint and whether or not this is your first complaint under the Rules, you may have the option to pursue an “informal resolution.” This typically involves taking responsibility for your actions, committing to abide by University policy in the future, taking part in an educational conversation, and/or some other form of restorative justice. The option for an informal resolution is available in most instances.
If you do not accept an informal resolution, the Rules Administrator has the option to gather and present evidence of the Rules that were allegedly violated to the University Judicial Board. The University Judicial Board will decide on one of the three following options:
- Charges unsupported (there is not enough information available),
- Not responsible (complainant did not violate the Rules), or
- Responsible (complainant did violate the Rules)
If you are found responsible for a Rules violation, you may face sanctions outlined in the Guidelines to the Rules of University Conduct. You will also have an opportunity to appeal the decision if you are found responsible.
All parties are treated with respect and dignity, and the outcome of an investigation is not prejudged. The Office of Rules Administration strives to achieve the highest levels of fairness, transparency, and efficiency. The Rules of University Conduct require that enforcement of the Rules be content-neutral at all times.
While administrators will make efforts to respect the privacy of individuals in The Rules process, confidentiality is not guaranteed. The University will reveal information about disciplinary proceedings only to those who need to know the information to carry out their duties and responsibilities. It will inform all University personnel participating in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing that they are expected to maintain confidentiality of the process and the privacy of the respondent. A respondent who successfully requests that a hearing be open may waive their rights to privacy.
If you would like to speak to a confidential resource, below is a list of confidential resources for Columbia students, faculty, and staff:
- Ombuds Office
- Counseling and Psychological Services (Morningside/Manhattanville students)
- Counseling Services (CUIMC students)
- Employee Assistance Program (Faculty & Staff)
- Religious Life
- Office of the University Chaplain
- Sexual Violence Response (SVR)
You can email [email protected].